As someone who is better versed in representational art, I have a harder time enjoying the work of John Cage. While I admire his drive to stay true to himself, I can’t say I am a fan of his music. But, I do believe his work holds value; I can appreciate Cage as a person, as well as how his originality inspired change in how we view art and music.
As I was reading the article, I kept thinking about Cage’s belief that “everything is music,” and its relation to how anything can be art. As a society, we have come up with definitions to make sense of the world around us; maybe in another universe, sitting in silence for 4 minutes and 33 seconds isn’t a controversial performance, and is actually the most prestige form of music. So while some may not appreciate the unconventionality of Cage’s music, his rationalization for making this type of music cannot be denied because in the end, language is something we made up, and is subject to change. So who are we to say what is and is not ‘music’ and ‘art?’
I also believe that if it’s something that can create conversation and debate, then it shouldn’t be cast aside; there’s clearly some value in Cage’s work, given that his controversy has led to discussions that have lasted for decades. Reading about Cage’s lifestyle choices is also inspirational, especially in a society so focused on the importance of monetary success. I love how Cage deviates from this and doesn’t let the world dictate what he can and cannot do. In this regard, I have a deep respect for John Cage.
Comments